Let's Scrap the
Seesaw Approach
|
|
What the politicians don't understand is, the goals of U.S. welfare programs should be seen not as competing goals, but as equally valued founding ideals, which need to be kept in balance.
The framers of the Constitution realized that the horse named “Pursuit of Happiness” must remain yoked to the horse named “Life and Liberty”, or the whole wagon would crash. In the 1830's, political philosopher Alexis deTocqueville saw America as a balance of goodness and greatness.1 In the 1990's, historian Marvin Olasky wrote about compassion and conservatism.2 As the 21st century opened, ambassador Alan Keyes called for a return to the ideals of individual liberty, balanced with social responsibility.3
A Balance of Security and OpportunitySome may protest that with our two-party system and the frequent hostility between the White House and Capitol Hill, pursuing twin goals is impossible. So many government programs are unbalanced, sacrificing one good for another. Welfare plans designed to be a “safety net” become more like a spider's web. Yet, the Constitution itself encourages us. It has protected both our love of independence and our belief in brotherhood for over 230 years! We believe that, with a balanced, comprehensive approach to welfare reform and tax reform — not a patchwork of conflicting “fixes” — we can promote and protect two genuine American ideals: Security and Opportunity. But this approach must work like the Constitution does, that is, Welfare Reform must apply to ALL Americans. It must be a system, as well as a foundation, which reflects both of these ideals — for all of us. ALL of us desire Security and Opportunity, for our own families, and for our fellow citizens. One Nation, Indivisible, Coming TogetherAmericans are a people of compassion; we hate to see others suffer. We want the poor, disabled and elderly to feel secure about their future. We also value freedom, a practical freedom that allows individuals, families, and businesses to pursue lawful interests without constant government involvement or interference. We want our children to feel that this is a land of opportunity. |
FREEDOM DICHOTOMY THE Means Testing: |
Should this apparent dichotomy, or tension, divide us?
What if, instead of taking sides, we start "Coming Together?"
What if, instead of competition, we seek balance?
What would Welfare look like if Americans were truly "Coming Together?"
Replace welfare's spider web with benefits for ALL citizens, efficiently delivered. HOW?
Replace the current, cumbersome income tax with a simple flat tax. WHY?
Click on the following links to see the our ideas on some of the details associated with this ComingTogether Plan:
A rethinking of this magnitude will affect many other issues. Some of the areas affected include:
These links discuss our views on topics related to this ComingTogether Plan:
Can those who want "every American to have a share in prosperity" be brought together with those who view government-run programs as "meddling with personal freedoms"?
While this program is "liberal" in that it would significantly increase the amount of money flowing through the federal government, it is "conservative" in that the government will be smaller and less intrusive in many ways, combining the strengths of both major political philosophies prevalent in this country today. The simplicity of the program should allow a significant reduction in the number of government employees. There would be far fewer rules and regulations to burden individuals and businesses. Many individuals would not have to file income tax returns at all. And the money would flow through the government very efficiently and back to citizens for making their own decisions on the actual use of the funds.
Note that this ComingTogether Plan also removes criteria that cause people to change their family situation just to receive benefits. This change should strengthen the family structure of the country.
The most important benefit comes from the elimination of means testing. Currently, persons receiving government benefits fear becoming more self-sufficient since they may lose the benefits. This program encourages everyone to be productive by assuring each person that their benefits will continue even if they increase their income. This will boost the economy, and therefore expand tax revenue.
|
Think of the single mother, and the frustration she feels when she leaves the welfare rolls and joins the workforce, only to find little improvement in her standard of living. She asks herself, "Why am I working? Why am I leaving my child?" This ComingTogether Plan gives her an answer. Her work, under this plan, will improve her standard of living — because she will receive her paycheck in addition to her benefits, not in place of them. |
|
|
Or think of the factory worker, a good worker but in a declining industry. He hasn't had a raise in three years. A new factory in an emerging technology industry opens up in his town, and offers to pay him 30% more than he's currently making. But he asks himself, "What about my chronically-ill wife? How can I afford to lose my employer-sponsored health plan?" His move, under this ComingTogether Plan, will not risk his wife's medical care. Under this plan, the health benefits are his, wherever he goes. |
|
Or think of the corporate employee, doing okay but hoping to have a business of his own. He designs an invention which he believes fills a need, and that people will buy. He asks himself, "If I leave my day job, will I still be able to eat?" His entrepreneurship, under this ComingTogether Plan, is encouraged. It will not be so traumatic to give up a regular paycheck, because he will have the basic benefits to fall back on. Becoming self-employed is no longer an impossibility for him. Under this plan, people can dare to dream, to produce, to enhance the productivity of the economy. |
|
Can we abolish poverty without taxing
the American dream out of existence?
ComingTogether.info
 
1Alexis deTocqueville, Democracy in America (1840). The quotation, usually attributed to deTocqueville, is "America is great because she is good. If America ceases to be good, America will cease to be great."
2Marvin Olasky, Ph.D., Compassionate Conservatism: What It Is, What It Does, and How It Can Change America (New York: Free Press, Simon and Schuster, 2000).
3Keyes, Alan, Our Character, Our Future: Reclaiming America's Moral Destiny (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, Harper Collins Publishers, 1996). "[The American Dream] ...is the dream of self-government that comes from respecting the fact that, in the end, freedom is not just a choice, it is not just an opportunity. It can be a burden and a sacrifice." p.14.